← Back to Concept Index

basis-diversity

The idea that normative standards for judgments vary between groups and contexts.

1 chapter across 1 book

Epistemology: An Introduction to the Theory of Knowledge (2003)Nicholas Rescher

Chapter 9

Chapter 9 critiques cognitive relativism, which holds that all knowledge standards are equally valid based solely on group acceptance, arguing that this position is flawed because it ignores the rational primacy of our own epistemic standards. The chapter contrasts relativism with contextualism, emphasizing that reason and objective standards—though not absolute or godlike—are necessary for meaningful inquiry and that rational acceptance carries a claim to universality. It concludes that relativism fails due to its neglect of functional efficacy in rational inquiry and that reasonable individuals can identify truths through shared rational standards.