← Back to Concept Indexbrain-data-privacy
The chapter highlights concerns about the security and ethical management of brain data, including risks of brain hacking and unauthorized access.
2 chapters across 1 book
Chapter 1: The Last Fortress 1. “All About EMG,” Noraxon USA, accessed August 17, 2022, https://www.noraxon.com/all- about-emg/. 2. Sara Goering et al., “Recommendations for Responsible Development and Application of Neurotechnologies,” Neuroethics 14 (2021): 365–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-021- 09468–6. 3. Marcello Ienca and Roberto Adorno, “Towards New Human Rights in the Age of Neuroscience and Neurotechnology,” Life Sciences, Society and Policy , 13 (2017). 4. Paul Buchheit, “On Gmail, AdSense and More,” BlogScoped , July 16, 2007, http://blogoscoped.com/archive/2007-07-16-n55.html. 5. Search Engine Market Share in 2022 , Oberlo, 2022. https://www.oberlo.com/statistics/search- engine-market-share. 6. Ben Gilbert, “How Facebook Makes Money from Your Data, in Mark Zuckerberg’s Words,” Business Insider , April 11, 2018, https://www.businessinsider.com/how-facebook-makes- money-according-to-mark-zuckerberg-2018-4. 7. Shoshana Zuboff, “Big Other: Surveillance Capitalism and the Prospects of an Information Civilization,” Journal of Information Technology 30 (2015): 75–89, https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2015.5. 8. Emil Protalinski, “CTRL-Labs CEO: We’ll Have Neural Interfaces in Less Than 5 Years,” VentureBeat , November 20, 2019, https://venturebeat.com/2019/11/20/ctrl-labs-ceo-well-have- neural-interfaces-in-less-than-5-years/. 9. Elise Reuter, “4 Takeaways from the 23&Me’s Planned SPAC Deal,” MedCityNews , February 7, 2021, https://medcitynews.com/2021/02/four-takeaways-from-23mes-planned-spac-deal/. 10. Charles Seife, “23andMe Is Terrifying, but Not for the Reasons the FDA Thinks,” Scientific American , November 27, 2013, https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/23andme-is- terrifying-but-not-for-the-reasons-the-fda-thinks/. 11. Emil Protalinski, “Ctrl-Labs CEO: We’ll Have Neural Interfaces in Less Than 5 Years,” VentureBeat , November 20, 2019, https://venturebeat.com/2019/11/20/ctrl-labs-ceo-well-have- neural-interfaces-in-less-than-5-years/. 12. Nick Statt, “Facebook Acquires Neural Interface Startup CTRL-Labs for Its Mind-Reading Wristband,” Verge , September 23, 2019, https://www.theverge.com/2019/9/23/20881032/facebook-ctrl-labs-acquisition-neural-interface- armband-ar-vr-deal. 13. Rachel Sandler, “Facebook Acquires Brain Computing Startup CTRL Labs,” Forbes , September 23, 2019, https://www.forbes.com/sites/rachelsandler/2019/09/23/facebook-acquires-brain- computing-startup-ctrl-labs/. 14. Adario Strange, “Facebook Chief Mark Zuckerberg Talks Immersive Remote Video & AR Smartglasses Following Major Reveals from Snap & Google,” Next Reality News , June 4, 2021, https://next.reality.news/news/facebook-chief-mark-zuckerberg-talks-immersive-remote- video-ar-smartglasses-following-major-reveals-from-snap-google-0384706/. 15. Strange, Zuckerberg Talks Immersive . 16. Zongkai Fu, Huiyong Li, Zhenchao Ouyang, Xuefeng Liu, and Jianwei Niu, “Typing Everywhere with an EMG Keyboard: A Novel Myo Armband-Based HCI Tool,” Algorithms and Architectures for Parallel Processing , Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 12452, ed.Chapter 1: The Last Fortress explores the emerging landscape of neurotechnology and brain-computer interfaces, highlighting the rapid development and commercialization of neural devices such as EMG-based interfaces and mind-reading wristbands. It critically examines the implications of these technologies on privacy, surveillance capitalism, and human rights, emphasizing the need for responsible development and ethical frameworks. The chapter also surveys key industry players like Facebook and Microsoft, and discusses the challenges posed by brain data security and the potential for brain hacking.
Chapter 10: On Cognitive Liberty 1. Brandon L. Garrett, Laurence R. Helfer, and Jayne C. Huckerby, “Closing International Law’s Innocence Gap,” Southern California Law Review 95 (2021): 311–64, 328. 2. Garrett, Helfer, and Huckerby, “Closing International Law’s Innocence Gap,” 328–31. 3. Garrett, Helfer, and Huckerby, “Closing International Law’s Innocence Gap,” 328. 4. Garrett, Helfer, and Huckerby, “Closing International Law’s Innocence Gap,” 329–30. 5. Garrett, Helfer, and Huckerby, “Closing International Law’s Innocence Gap,” 333.Chapter 10, titled 'On Cognitive Liberty,' primarily references the work of Garrett, Helfer, and Huckerby on international law's gaps regarding innocence and cognitive rights. The chapter emphasizes the need for legal frameworks to protect cognitive liberty against emerging neurotechnologies that can manipulate, surveil, or diminish brain function. It highlights the intersection of brain data privacy, bioethics, and the societal implications of brain enhancement and manipulation technologies.