Opening the stacks
Opening the stacks
Processes by which the state transforms complex social and natural realities into standardized, legible formats to facilitate governance and control.
3 chapters across 1 book
Chapter 9 of 'Seeing Like a State' elaborates on the concept of metis, or practical knowledge, emphasizing its critical role in counterbalancing the state's efforts to simplify and render society legible through standardized schemes. Scott traces the intellectual and institutional influences behind his work and critiques high-modernist social engineering, arguing that its failures stem from reliance on schematic, state-driven simplifications combined with authoritarianism and weakened civil society. The chapter highlights the tension between formal state planning and informal, local knowledge, underscoring how both state and market forces can suppress diversity and practical wisdom.
The chapter examines the state's efforts to render communal land tenure systems fiscally legible through cadastral mapping and individual property regimes, using prerevolutionary Russian reforms as a case study. It critiques cadastral maps for their abstraction and administrative myopia, which freeze dynamic social and ecological realities into static, simplified representations that prioritize taxation and control. The chapter also explores how these state simplifications actively transform social relations and land ownership, while local populations resist and adapt, creating a persistent gap between official records and lived realities.
The chapter explores how the modern state achieves administrative legibility and control through simplifications such as the imposition of a single official language and the centralization of infrastructure, exemplified by Parisian French and radial traffic networks in France. It discusses the state's reliance on standardized, aggregated data and typifications to manage complex social realities, highlighting both the utility and limitations of these simplifications, as well as the state's power to enforce its categories through authoritative documents. The chapter emphasizes the tension between the state's drive for legibility and the erasure of local diversity and complexity inherent in these processes.