Keith Roberts was an engineer who wrote fiction, and you can feel the lathe turning beneath every sentence. *Machines and Men* is a 1974 collection that operates less as a unified argument than as a series of diagnostic readings — probes inserted into the soft tissue where human consciousness meets mechanical intrusion. The stories that survive in memory are not the ones with the cleverest gadgets but the ones where a person sits alone in a room, overwhelmed by input they never asked for. Travers, unable to escape the sonic saturation of his hyperdense future, stuffing makeshift plugs into his ears and retreating into the hallucination of a woman who may or may not exist — this is not a story about sound. It is a story about what happens when the environment becomes adversarial and the only refuge is a constructed interiority. In 2026, anyone who has turned off notifications, deleted an app, or put their phone in a drawer to feel something resembling quiet will recognize the shape of Travers' problem, even if the specific technology Roberts imagined looks quaint. He got the phenomenology right. The constant noise is not acoustic anymore; it is informational, algorithmic, ambient. But the flinch is the same.

The telekinetic narrator of the unnamed opening story presents a different angle on the same wound. Here is a man whose power is granular — cellular, even — and whose tragedy is not that he cannot act but that action itself has become unbearable. He could manipulate his mother's heart at the level of individual cells and still could not save her. The metaphor is almost too clean for 2026, a year in which we have mapped genomes, edited genes with CRISPR, monitored cardiac rhythms from wristwatches, and still lose people to depression. Roberts understood something that the techno-optimists of his era and ours keep having to relearn: resolution is not the same as control. You can see every cell and still not know what to do. The narrator's vow of abstinence from his own abilities reads now like a parable about the exhaustion of capability — the particular modern despair of having tools and no wisdom for their use.

What Roberts could not see, or chose not to look at, is revealing. The futures in *Machines and Men* are populated almost entirely by solitary men navigating their crises in isolation. Women appear as objects of psychic fixation — Julie, whose driving the narrator longs to control; Deidre, who exists as emotional refuge in what may be a hallucination. This is the 1970s British SF blind spot in full flower: the interior life is rendered with real precision, but the social world is thin, and the gendered assumptions are load-bearing. There is no network here, no community, no collective response to technological saturation. Each protagonist suffers alone. Roberts could imagine a man hearing everything and a man feeling every cell, but he could not quite imagine a world where people might organize around their shared overwhelm — where the response to noise might be political rather than merely psychological. The absence of any digital commons, any social dimension to the information problem, marks the book as pre-internet in ways that go deeper than missing smartphones.